In the early 1800s Robert Owen, a social reformer, began using the
catch-call “8 hours labour, 8 hours recreation, 8 hours rest.” Two
hundred years later we still work roughly the same amount of time. Work has
been the way in which we customarily spend our day, from 9 to 5. Work is what
we do. Work is who we are. Work defines us.
But, does it have to be this way? The work ethic needs to be questioned.
Note that this is not intended to be read as suggesting that any one individual
should quit their job. But, as a culture, we do need to question our belief in
work. There are at least six reasons for doing so.
1. Work is Boring
A Gallup survey in 2013 covering 142 countries found that just 13% of
employees were “engaged” in their work. A further 63% were “not engaged” and
fully one-in-four (24%) were “actively disengaged.” These disengaged employees
(seven out of every eight) lacked motivation and were less likely to invest
added effort towards organisational goals or outcomes. Amongst the reasons for
disengagement are: feeling ignored, inability to be creative, a lack of purpose,
inflexible work schedules, and a feeling of not making a difference.
2. Work is Damaging the Planet and Others
The amount of time we spend working contributes directly to our carbon
footprint. We work in order to earn, and earn in order to consume. Consumption
is the leading human contributor to carbon emissions. Because we spend so much
time working we do not have the time to stop to reflect upon how we could live
more sustainably and cheaply.
When we stop to think about it, it is easy to name the industries that are
damaging the earth’s environment: mining and ore processing, lead-acid battery
production and recycling, lead smelting, chemical manufacturing, the dye
industry, and tannery operations, and many more.
Nor does it take much research to discover how much of work exploits others:
children, peasant farmers, sweat-shop workers, the poor and dispossessed.
3. Work is Unnecessary
Work in pre-colonisation indigenous societies took up much less time than it
does today. It has been estimated that in many such societies just eighteen
hours per week was needed by each person to provide for food and shelter. Even
in western culture the amount of time spent working prior to the Industrial
Revolution was much less than we work today. In the 13th and 14th centuries in
the UK the average peasant or labourer spent between 1400 to 1600 hours working
per year.1 The average annual working hours per worker throughout
most of the OECD today ranges between 1600 and 1800 hours.
Recently the new economics foundation in the UK estimated that a 21
hour working week is sufficient to enable the economy to be maintained, provide
for our needs and allow for greater equity in employment.2 Over a
year that would mean working for approximately 1000 hours – a reduction of 40%
from our present norm.
4. Work Does Not Define Who I Am
One of the prevailing justifications for work is that it provides us with an
identity and with meaning. Certainly, meaning and self-identity are two of the
fundamental needs that we have. But to state, unequivocally, that work gives
them to us is to make the mistake of confusing needs with strategies. Work may
be a strategy for obtaining identity, but it is only that – a
strategy, not the strategy. If you stop to think about what the need is
that you have and then think of strategies to achieve that; I am certain that a
number of other strategies will come to mind.
Work does not define us. Nor should we allow others to define us by our
work. One of the most pernicious questions that we ask of others when we first
meet is “what do you do?” meaning what is your work? This question is grounded
in defining a persons worth. The job defines how worthy or otherwise the person
is. It is demeaning.
5. Work Makes it Difficult to Retire
Retirement is now recognised as a significant contributor to the risk of men
(women much less so) becoming clinically depressed and/or suicidal. Research in
the US suggests that retirement increases the risk of depression in men by 40%.
Self-help and support programs are now in place to help men adjust to
retirement, but the causes of these depressions are created much earlier - in
the work ethic. For the previous 40 years of their lives men have been goaded,
exhorted, encouraged, even coerced into work. “Get a job,” “climb the corporate
ladder,” “get a better job” are just some of the messages that men are bombarded
with, many even before they enter the work force. Much of the education system
can be critiqued as being nothing much more than a training ground for future
employees.
So, it is no wonder that with retirement comes depression. Men have not
learnt how to live a full, rewarding, satisfying, or contributing life during
those 40 years. All men know is how to work, except for a couple of weeks each
year when they can relax. Relaxation is only one aspect of living. A couple of
weeks is insufficient to learn the pleasures of all the other aspects of
life.
Surely it would be much better for us individually, and collectively, to
learn about work-life balance and apply it throughout our lives rather than work
40 years, retire, and then live 20 more years in a depressed state. Its
insane.
6 Work is a Con-Job
Max Weber wrote his seminal book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of
Capitalism in 1904 and 1905. In it Weber traced the beginnings of the
protestant work ethic to the Reformation of the 16th century, with possible
antecedents to the Middle Ages. Weber’s thesis was that peoples salvation prior
to the Reformation lay in accepting the authority of the (Catholic) church.
However, the Reformation undermined these assurances and salvation came to be
understood as lying in one’s works.
By the time Weber wrote his book though, the religious connection with work
had largely gone and work became viewed within the capitalist mode that pervaded
western societies.
This work ethic remains embedded within the capitalist approach and within
our western cultures. But it is nothing more than a belief. We still live
under the shackle of the protestant work ethic belief.
Summing Up
We live in a society in which we have, in abundance, all the skills,
resources, and connections that we need in order to live lives of fulfilment,
security, and contentment, We can do this without having to work 40
hours per week. We can do this without having to damage the earth. We
can do this without having to exploit others.
Notes:
1. Juliet B. Schor, The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of
Leisure, Basic Books, New York, 1992
2. Anna Coote, Jane Franklin and Andrew Simms, 21 Hours: Why a shorter
working week can help us all to flourish in the 21st century, new economics
foundation (nef) 2010.
Reflections, commentaries, critiques and ideas from 40 years experience in the fields of Community Development, Community Education and Social Justice. Useful tools and techniques that I have learnt also added occassionally.
Pages
The name of this blog, Rainbow Juice, is intentional.
The rainbow signifies unity from diversity. It is holistic. The arch suggests the idea of looking at the over-arching concepts: the big picture. To create a rainbow requires air, fire (the sun) and water (raindrops) and us to see it from the earth.
Juice suggests an extract; hence rainbow juice is extracting the elements from the rainbow, translating them and making them accessible to us. Juice also refreshes us and here it symbolises our nutritional quest for understanding, compassion and enlightenment.
The rainbow signifies unity from diversity. It is holistic. The arch suggests the idea of looking at the over-arching concepts: the big picture. To create a rainbow requires air, fire (the sun) and water (raindrops) and us to see it from the earth.
Juice suggests an extract; hence rainbow juice is extracting the elements from the rainbow, translating them and making them accessible to us. Juice also refreshes us and here it symbolises our nutritional quest for understanding, compassion and enlightenment.
Tuesday, 19 July 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.