|Effects of sea level rise in the Maldives
Some are claiming that 2°C is too great a warming. Significantly, it is the least developed nations calling for a target of 1.5°C. Mr Giza Gaspar-Martins, from Angola, and chair of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) group said:
“The current plans to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions do not keep the world within the ‘safe’ temperature rise of 2°C. But from a Least Developed Country perspective, it is far worse than that. For the LDCs, economic development, regional food security, ecosystems, and the very survival of their populations and livelihoods are at risk if talks aim only for a 2°C world.”Gaspar-Martins and the poorest nations of the world are supported by the Alliance Of Small Island States (AOSIS), who are already suffering the effects of sea level rise. The chair of the Alliance, Thoriq Ibrahim from the Maldives1 had this to say:
“Slower onset events like sea level rise and ocean acidification continue to assault our small states. Climate change in all its forms is a new reality for us and it is getting worse.”He went on to say that
“a long-term temperature goal of well below 1.5 degrees must be reflected in the Paris Agreement, along with an indicative pathway for achieving it, including urgent peaking and deep mid-century emissions reductions.”Those of us in the western-styled, rich nations of the world must take note. It is the poor nations and the small island states that are experiencing the worst effects of climate change, yet they are the nations contributing the least to this change. A simple graph plotting per capita GDP against per capita greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is very telling.
In this graph the horizontal axis represents per capita GDP in US dollars and the vertical axis per capita tonnes of GHGs. The vertical blue line marks a per capita GDP of $10,000 US – one hundred and twenty nations lie to the left of this line! The graph is a scatter diagram with the red line representing the “line of best fit” showing the rough correlation between GDP and GHG emissions.
Telling, isn’t it? Clearly, it is the rich nations that contribute most significantly towards GHG emissions and therefore climate change.
And we in the western-styled, rich nations continue to consume at ever alarming rates. The richest 1/5th of the world’s population consume 86% of the world’s resources.2 Meanwhile one-third of the world’s population living in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, consume just 3.2%.
We must face it – it is our consumption patterns that contribute to climate change. It is those of us in the western-styled, rich nations that continue to consume in great, excessive, obscene levels; who condemn those living in poor nations and small island states to the ravages of climate change.
Certainly, we must continue to ensure that our leaders put in place the policies needed at COP. Certainly, we must continue to oppose mining and drilling for fossil fuels. Certainly, we must continue advocating for renewable energy.
But, if we continue driving our cars to climate change rallies, continue to eat meat in vast quantities, continue to throw food away, continue to adopt the latest fads and fashions, continue to be hooked on electronic and telecommunications gadgetry then we will continue to cop out.3
Let’s not cop out.
1. The average height of the Maldives is just 1.2 metres above sea level, and the highest point is only 2.4m above sea level, making this nation the most vulnerable to sea level rise.
2. This 20% consume: 45% of all meat and fish, 58% of the total energy, 84% of all paper, have 74% of all telephone lines, and own 87% of the world's vehicle fleet. (Source, worldcentric.org accessed 1-12-15)
3. Cop out is a slang term meaning to avoid or shirk responsibility, to fail to fulfil a commitment, or to provide an evasive excuse.