Or,
perhaps we think of ourselves. Each birthday reminds us that we are one year
older, one year closer to the end of our time on Earth. Yet, there are many
things we still want to do, much we wish to accomplish and achieve.
Time is
running out.
We must
act with urgency.
We gotta
do something, and fast.
We must
complete our bucket list.
We have to
save the planet.
We have to
reduce carbon emissions. We have to transition to green technology soon.
Each of
these sentiments are understandable. Yet, more than likely, they are unhealthy
and unwise. Speeding up might get us there faster, but when we get there we
will find that it is not where we wanted to be or what we expected.
Just look
at the current situation we are in with carbon emissions. It can be argued that
we have got to this position because we wanted to hurry up. We built,
purchased, and drove private motorcars because we wanted to get from one place
to another quicker. We tapped into the stored sunlight of fossil fuels so that
we could more rapidly heat our homes and cook our meals. Those same fossil fuel
power stations enabled the elites of the world to more quickly build their
fortunes.
The mobile
phone, too, is a go faster piece of technology. We can more quickly
contact anyone, anywhere on the planet. We can send text, photographs, and
documents at the speed of light. That’s fast! Yet, those same phones have
presented us with numerous problems; e-waste, cyber-bullying, cognitive
decline, and the modern disease of nomophobia – the fear of not having
access to a mobile phone.
The Vietnamese
Buddhist monk, Thich Nhat Hanh names all this as Habit Energy which he
describes as,
"We are always running and
rushing. It has become a habit, the norm of everyday living. We run all the
time, during our sleep, the time we are supposed to be resting and regenerating
our bodies. We can be worst enemies, in conflict with ourselves, and therefore,
you can easily start conflict with others..."
It is
exhausting us. It is exhausting the planet as well.
‘But
surely we have to do something quickly in the face of imminent and mounting
crises. We are in the midst of a predicament of massive proportions. We can’t
sit back. We have to get on with it. We have to save the planet, and
ourselves.’
I hear
such sentiments every week.
And, we
are responding to this predicament in exactly the way described. We are quickly
digging up not only fossil fuels, but also minerals to power the green energy
transition. The speed with which we are doing this has not reduced electricity
consumption at all – it has simply added to it. We are using twice as much
electricity today as we were at the turn of the century. Wind and solar
electricity production is 1/3rd of that increase. Wind and solar
have added to the consumption, they have not displaced it. They are not proving
to be alternatives at all.
What if we
slowed down?
What if,
as a friendly psychologist told me about four decades ago, we stopped awhile and
smelt the roses?
At an
individual level slowing down has been shown, in numerous studies, to lower our
levels of anxiety and stress, improve our cognitive responses, enhance our
connection and relationships with other people, and elevate our body’s ability
to heal and recuperate. In short, slowing down is good for our well-being.
For the
planet too, our slowing down would have tremendous benefit. We have vastly
overshot the carrying capacity of Earth. Overshoot occurs when the Earth can no
longer recover from the effects of human waste and pollution quicker than the
waste and pollution is created. Overshoot is also when the Earth can no longer
replenish the stores of forest, minerals, water, and other components of an
eco-system faster than humans are extracting and exploiting those components.
We have
been in this state of overshoot for many decades, and the rate of overshoot is
increasing. Globally, we now require 1.6 Earths to satisfy our rate of extraction
and levels of pollution. This figure (1.6 planets) is unevenly distributed
around the world. If everyone lived as those in rich nations lived, we would
need between three and six Earths to satisfy our consumption levels.
Slowing
down would assist the Earth in restoring its balance immensely.

No comments:
Post a Comment
This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.