The name of this blog, Rainbow Juice, is intentional.
The rainbow signifies unity from diversity. It is holistic. The arch suggests the idea of looking at the over-arching concepts: the big picture. To create a rainbow requires air, fire (the sun) and water (raindrops) and us to see it from the earth.
Juice suggests an extract; hence rainbow juice is extracting the elements from the rainbow, translating them and making them accessible to us. Juice also refreshes us and here it symbolises our nutritional quest for understanding, compassion and enlightenment.

Wednesday, 8 January 2025

Fragments and Parts

David Bohm
In May 1984 a group of forty people of varying age, nationality, and professions met with Professor David Bohm to converse with him about his theories of the implicate and explicate order of the universe. Over the course of a weekend, this ground-breaking conversation was recorded, then transcribed, and published as the book Unfolding Meaning.1

David Bohm (1917 – 1992) is one of many distinguished theoretical physicists that emerged between the late 19th century and the middle of the 20th century. Along with such well-known physicists as Einstein, Bohr, Schrödinger, Pauli, and others, Bohm helped pioneer concepts in quantum physics, relativity, and the wave-particle duality.

Together these theoretical physicists also began to recognise, and explain, that things were not always as they seem. Bohm, as with others, also recognised that attempting to discover the workings of the cosmos (and the human mind in Bohm’s case) could not be done by looking at the world piece by piece. Things were much more intricately linked, and entangled, than a mechanistic worldview could explain.

Early in the dialogues Bohm noted that too often the world was viewed through a mechanistic lens. In expanding upon this he stated that there was a ‘…far reaching and pervasive fragmentation that arises out of the mechanistic world view.’ He went on to distinguish between a fragment and a part.

He used a metaphor to do so. ‘To hit a watch with a hammer would not produce parts, but fragments that are separated in ways that are not significantly related to the structure of the watch.’2

Indeed, as Bohm noted, the words fragment and part both come to us from Latin. The Latin word fragmentum means a piece broken off. The Latin word partum, however, means a portion of a whole. Quite different meanings and consequences.

After many centuries of breaking up phenomena and trying to explain the resultant mess, at least some sectors of the scientific world are realising that phenomena cannot be broken; a holistic, systems view, must be adopted.

The next step must be for other fields of human endeavour (e.g. economics, politics, business, education, and health) to recognise this as well.

The step after that is to remove the splitting of human endeavours into fragments and realise that humanity is part of this wonderful body called nature.

Notes:

1. David Bohm, Unfolding Meaning, A Weekend of Dialogue with David Bohm, Ark Paperbacks, London & New York, 1987

2. p.23

No comments:

Post a Comment

This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.