First, an apology to those readers expecting to read this week’s blog earlier than today. A cold kept me uninspired and unenthusiastic for much of this week. Now, on with the blog.
![]() |
Plato's Cave |
Surely an example of oxymoron must be that of: Reality
TV.
Not only is the term blatantly contradictory, but it
also has harmful side-effects. Let us begin with its contradictory nature.
What is real and what is not real has been the subject
of debate and conjecture within western thought since at least the times of
Plato and his allegory of the cave in the 4th century BCE. (Come to
think of it, Plato’s allegory could be a very early precursor to Reality TV)
However, most of us would agree that reality is what is tangible and exists in
a sensory manner. Often reality is easier defined by what it is not. Reality is
not imaginary, not something made up, not contrived, not fictitious. (I
acknowledge that this short definition is debatable, but for the purposes of
this blog I think it makes sense.)
Reality TV is
not real. Reality TV programs are made up, they use contrived situations;
then go and broadcast the program on TV which stimulates a very base level of
imagination in our neocortex and thalamus areas of our brains.
Yet, between 60% and 70% (up to 80% in some places) of
adults in western countries watch Reality TV!!
It is not simply that every night adults sit
transfixed as if under the influence of Aldous Huxley’s drug – soma – in his
1932 dystopian novel, Brave New World. That state is bad enough, but Reality
TV has some nasty effects. Without going into detail in each case, here are
some of these harmful consequences.
- Many Reality TV shows seek to humiliate and exploit participants.
- Reality TV has
a tendency to make someone “famous for being famous” – with otherwise no
qualities of fame.
- Stand-offs and obscenities are often glamorised and
elevated on Reality TV.
- Reality TV promotes
materialism and a toxic individualism.
- Situations on Reality TV are contrived, although usually promoted as being spontaneous and unscripted.
What many viewers may not recognise is that Reality
TV has been a vehicle for helping to normalise public surveillance. Reality
TV intrudes, sometimes intimately, on the lives of participants in ways
that would not normally be tolerated. With over 30 years’ worth of Reality
TV having now been beamed into the homes of millions of viewers, this
intrusion has become normalised, so that surveillance in the real
world is similarly tolerated, accepted, and even welcomed.
If anyone knows the distinction between reality and
non-reality, then an actor would be one of those people. Acting requires the
ability to set aside one’s real life and step into the shoes of an unreal,
fictional character.
The English actor, Gary Oldman, has done this many
times in his distinguished career. He has played characters as diverse as Count
Dracula, Lee Harvey Oswald, Sid Vicious, Sirius Black (in the Harry Potter
series) and the spy George Smiley. In 2017 he won an Academy Award for Best
Actor in the film Darkest Hour for his portrayal of Winston Churchill.
He knows the difference between TV and film acting,
and the oxymoronic Reality TV. His caustic words bear musing on. ‘Reality
TV to me is the museum of social decay.’
P.S.
Here is a question to ponder. If it had not been for
the Reality TV program The Apprentice, in which Donald Trump
appeared as the host, would he now be the President of the US? That show placed
Trump directly in front of millions of American TV viewers and presented him as
a successful and leading businessman (even though reality shows him not
to be). Would the fateful words of that show – ‘You’re fired’ – not now be
coming to haunt many of those same TV viewers?
No comments:
Post a Comment
This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.