In a recent interview (2 July 2025) the noted environmentalist David Suzuki answered one of the questions put to him with this disconcerting reply, ‘I’ve never said this before to the media, but it’s too late.’1
Suzuki
spoke in that interview of the nine Planetary Boundaries that the Stockholm
Resilience Centre has been tracking since 2009. Speaking of these boundaries,
Suzuki was forthright, ‘If we pass one boundary we should be shitting our
pants. We’ve passed seven!’
Yes, seven
out of nine. When the average global warming reached 1.55 degrees C above
pre-industrial levels (thereby exceeding 1.5 degrees) the seventh planetary
boundary was surpassed.
When I
read Suzuki’s interview I asked myself: When do we give up?
When, like
David Suzuki, do we realise it is all too late?
In 1992
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the first international
treaty dealing with climate change did not settle on a level of warming to be
heeded. Further conferences and meetings converged on 2 degrees above
pre-industrial levels as a limit for a warming we should not go past. In the
2015 Paris Agreement experts concluded that even 2 degrees posed severe risks.
The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the Least Developed Countries
(LDCs) lobbied for a more stringent level of 1.5 degrees of warming.
Notwithstanding
the concerns and fears of those most at risk of climate change (the AOSIS and
the LDCs) last year we shattered that boundary and those countries hopes.
The only
two boundaries that are still within safe limits are those associated with ozone
depletion (because we took serious steps to alleviate this risk in the 1980s)
and aerosol pollution.
To expand
on David Suzuki’s reference about ‘shitting out pants’ we could say that
we are now in a pile of that shit.
And, it is
too late to change.
The UN has
been holding climate change conferences for decades. In 1995 the first COP
(Conference of the Parties) meeting was held in Berlin. Since then we have had
twenty-eight more, COP29 was held last November 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan. The
location brought howls of dismay, protest, and alarm, given that Azerbaijan is
a major oil and gas producer.
COP30 is
due to take place this year in an Amazonian state, in the city of Belém, Brazil.
Also a site of controversy, given its location in the northern parts of the
Amazon rainforest.
Thirty
years of COPs. Thirty years of greater energy use. Thirty years of amplifying carbon
emissions. Thirty years of increasing carbon in the atmosphere (global average
carbon dioxide reached 422.7 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere in 2024
– 50% higher than it was before the Industrial Revolution.) Thirty years of
inaction.
So, when
do we give up?
When do
our leaders give up flying all around the world to various COP and other
climate change conferences? With little or no meaningful outcomes.
When do we
stop driving our cars to protests outside parliaments, senates, and other
government offices? With little or no impact upon our elected politicians.
When do we
stop trying to fix things with more and more (including so-called green and
sustainable) technology? In the process continuing to mine and exploit the
earth.
In doing
things such as these examples we increase
the energy use, we add to emissions, we get warmer.
Yes, they
may be small actions, but then so too is 3.75 ppm – the difference in global
average carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2023 and 2024.
Let me
spell that out a bit more. 3.75 ppm is just 3.75 parts per 1,000,000. Or, put
it another way, it is just 0.000357%. Small isn’t it? But, boy, does it make a
difference.
Let’s give
up doing all that shit. Let’s stop shitting out pants (thanks David Suzuki.)
But, let
us not stop:
·
Loving
the earth
·
Reducing
consumption
·
Being
kind to one another
·
Thinking
of future generations
·
Caring
for the other creatures upon this planet
·
Enjoying
the small things.
Notes:
1. ‘It’s
too late’: David Suzuki says the fight against climate change is lost -
iPolitics accessed 8 July 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment
This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.