Yeah, we know.
It’s climate change.
Not according to Alice J Friedemann. The problem is energy. We won’t have any, and we won’t have any very
soon.
Alice Friedemann has been writing about energy and
related fields on her website (energyskeptic.com) for over a decade. Life After Fossil Fuels: A Reality Check
on Alternative Energy,1 condenses ten year’s worth of her
writings into a highly readable, rigorously researched, and at times humorous, two-hundred-page
expose of energy.
Our two-hundred-year dependence upon fossil fuels is
rapidly coming to an end, says Friedemann.
What can we replace that with?
First though, she reminds us that fossil fuels are not
just the source of energy and/or electricity.
Fossil fuels are a prime component of just about every commodity in our
modern life. From asphalt to rubber,
from toothpaste to shampoo, from curtains to umbrellas. Oh, and for any readers in Australia – fossil
fuels are used in the manufacture of surfboards.
Considering energy alone Friedemann is skeptical. What can replace fossil fuels? She considers all options: CNG, LNG,
liquified coal, nuclear, hydrogen, ammonia, oil shale, biodiesel, and
“renewables.” Her conclusion for all of
them – they won’t work. Each of them
will not work for one or more of the following reasons:
· Too
heavy. Storing enough energy in
batteries to provide power for trucks will take almost all, if not more, of the
allowable weight of the truck. Where do
you put the goods? Batteries are highly
unlikely to become light enough. We are
already using lithium batteries, and lithium is the third lightest element.
· Too
costly.
· Take
up too much land area. For example, if
wish to provide the world’s electricity requirement with “renewables” then the
mining for the materials needed would engulf 37% of the world’s land area. Imagine what that would do for biodiversity.
· EROEI
(Energy Return On Energy Investment) is either far too low, or in some cases
negative.
· Unable
to be scaled up.
· Too
short a lifespan. What happens to the
waste?
· Require
ever scarcer rare minerals.
· Unable
to provide enough heat for manufacturing purposes. Half our fossil fuels are presently used in
manufacturing. The irony here is that
manufacturing wind turbines and solar panels requires a heat much greater than
wind and solar can obtain. Fossil fuels
must be used to generate the heat required to manufacture these “renewables.” Renewables are not renewable, Friedemann
says, they are “rebuildable” (at least in the short term).
Friedemann does suggest one possible source –
biomass. However, she manages to show
just how limited that is as an option also.
So, what to do?
Friedemann, with characteristic droll wit, tells us
that:
“The
only other alternative would be to get rid of economic systems that depend upon
endless growth on a finite planet.”
Simplify, localise, decentralise. These are the components of an alternative
economic system that Friedemann suggest.
Now there’s a thought. I wonder
if anyone has thought of writing a book about that?
P.S. I am hopeful that a further review of this book will
be placed upon this blogsite – a review from a person who has a
background in energy systems. Watch this
space.
Note:
Alice J Friedemann, Life After Fossil Fuels: A
Reality Check on Alternative Energy, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham,
Switzerland, 2021.
"Time taken in stocking energy to build an energy system, and then building the system - will always be longer than the entire useful lifetime of the system.
ReplyDeleteEnergy, like time, flows from past to future."
Thank You Bruce and Friedemann, great job.