
Is it …
True?
Honest?
Inspiring?
Necessary?
Kind?
Most of us, in our work for social justice, environmental preservation, or community development, have one common goal – the desire for a better world.
The creation, or evolution, of a better world surely includes how we treat one another, including those with whom we may disagree.
In that disagreement it is still possible to speak with thought – to THINK about what we say, and about how we say it.
Note that the acronym does not ask: Is It Agreeing? We do not need to agree in order to be kind, honest, or inspiring.
Let’s also be clear about how we disagree, and what we disagree about.
Suppose you have a preference for Earl Grey tea over English Breakfast tea. Suppose I prefer English Breakfast and dislike Earl Grey.
What if I say to you “Earl Grey is vile, loathsome rubbish.” That may be my truth, but it is hardly inspiring. It is also unnecessary, and it is definitely unkind. I could have just said “I prefer English Breakfast,” or nothing at all.
Disagreement for disagreements sake is pointless and often ignites tensions and quickly descends into an unnecessary argument.
The other sort of disagreement that is pointless is that of name-calling and insult. In a recent post I noted that this usually leads to disconnection and greater polarisation.
In our work towards a better world we eventually come to a realisation that we are all connected. At some deeper level we are all kin.
In our speech (and our writing) it would pay to THINK first, and then speak (or write) with kindness.1
Note
1. The word kin and kindness come from the same etymological root.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This blogsite is dedicated to positive dialoque and a respectful learning environment. Therefore, I retain the right to remove comments that are: profane, personal attacks, hateful, spam, offensive, irrelevant (off-topic) or detract in other ways from these principles.